FTH
FTHOverseas cancer medical information

Home › Blog › Papers & translation

Papers & translation · EUS-guided RFA · 2026

Pancreatic NET Radiofrequency Ablation: 91% Response in 46 Patients

FTH editorial team · · Source checked October 30, 2026

Read in other languages · 한국어 · 中文 · العربية

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) uses an endoscopic ultrasound scope passed through the mouth. Guided by the ultrasound image, the doctor places a thin needle electrode into the tumor and destroys it with radiofrequency heat, with no skin incision. In a study of 46 patients from seven centers led by NYU Langone Health, 91.1% had a complete or partial response at final follow-up, and tumors shrank by an average of 72%.

In a prospective study at Okayama University Hospital in Japan, all five patients with tumors of 15 mm or less had complete response on CT at 1 and 6 months. This article also covers two 2026 review papers and explains who is eligible, the results, side effects and where the treatment is offered.

EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cover image
AI-generated concept image

Treatment status · EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation is performed for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at university hospitals in the US, Europe and Japan. It is not yet a standard replacement for surgery. The studies below are a multicenter analysis, a registered prospective study in Japan (jRCTs062230014) and a meta-analysis, all in human patients. This article is general information, not a treatment recommendation.

What is a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor?

A pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) grows from hormone-producing cells of the pancreas. It is different from the common type of pancreatic cancer (ductal adenocarcinoma) and usually grows slowly. More small tumors of about 1 cm are now found by chance on scans done for other reasons.

Nonfunctional tumors release no excess hormone and cause no symptoms, while insulinomas release insulin and cause episodes of low blood sugar. Surgery has been the main treatment, but pancreatic surgery is major and recovery takes time. Small nonfunctional tumors under 2 cm are often followed with regular scans instead. EUS-guided RFA is being studied as an option between these two approaches.

ApproachWhat it involvesKey points
SurgeryRemoving the part of the pancreas with the tumorLong-established treatment; longer hospital stay and recovery
SurveillanceRegular CT, MRI or endoscopic ultrasoundCommon for nonfunctional tumors under 2 cm
EUS-guided RFANeedle electrode placed from inside the stomach or duodenumNo skin incision; can be repeated if needed

Based on Tringali A, Caiazzo A. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026 and NYU Langone's study summary.

How EUS-guided RFA is done

The scope is passed through the mouth like a gastroscopy. From the stomach or duodenum the pancreas is seen clearly on ultrasound. A 19-gauge needle electrode is placed in the tumor and radiofrequency current produces heat. Larger tumors receive several applications. At Okayama the median procedure time was 16 minutes.

The heating principle is the same as radiofrequency ablation for liver or lung tumors; only the route differs. See our RFA guide and IVR guide.

US study of 46 patients: 91% response

Tamas A. Gonda, MD, and colleagues at NYU Langone Health reported 46 patients treated at seven tertiary centers from 2021 to 2024 in Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2026). All had biopsy-confirmed nonfunctional tumors under 3 cm without metastasis; mean size was 12.7 mm and most were grade 1. Technical success was 100%.

Time pointComplete responsePartial responseLittle or no response
First follow-up (mean 4.5 months)32.6%47.8%19.6%
Final follow-up (mean about 16 months)60.0%31.1%8.9%

Overall response 91.1%; mean tumor size reduction 72%. From NYU Langone and AGA reports of the study.

Of 31 patients with a partial or no response at first follow-up, 18 had a repeat session, usually just one, and 44.4% of them converted to complete response. About one-third of those without a repeat session also reached complete response over time. "Not everyone responded equally, but almost everyone eventually responded," Dr. Gonda said. A 7- or 10-mm electrode tip (versus 5 mm) and more applications favored early complete response.

Prospective study at Okayama University

Okayama University Hospital enrolled patients from May 2023 to December 2024 under a prespecified protocol and published in DEN Open (2025). Eligible tumors were grade 1, 15 mm or less, confirmed by biopsy.

ItemResult
Patients5 (median age 64; median tumor 10 mm)
Complete response on contrast CT100% at 1 and 6 months
Median procedure time16 minutes
Median hospital stay5 days
New or worse diabetesNone
Severe adverse eventsNone

Matsumoto K, et al. DEN Open 2025;5:e70073 (jRCTs062230014).

Japanese meta-analysis of 26 studies

The Okayama team pooled 26 studies published from 2005 to April 2025 in Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology (January 2026), comparing RFA with EUS-guided ethanol injection.

Tumor typeRFA clinical successEthanol injection
Insulinoma95%77%
Nonfunctional tumor85%76%

Matsumoto K, et al. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 2026;19.

Results were especially strong for insulinoma. A 2026 Italian review of 29 studies (230 patients) with functioning tumors found clinical success of 100% in most studies.

Side effects and management

The most common problems are abdominal pain and pancreatitis, usually mild and settled with fasting, fluids and pain relief. In the NYU study 7 of 46 patients (15%) had adverse events, and none occurred after repeat sessions.

StudyAdverse eventsOutcome
US, 46 patients15%, mainly pain and pancreatitisOne partial pancreatectomy for a duct stricture; one bleed treated in hospital
Japan, 5 patientsAsymptomatic pseudocyst in 2, mild pancreatitis in 1All resolved with conservative care
Meta-analysisFluid collection 1.9%, duct stricture 1.4%Mostly mild; one death reported in a 97-year-old

The authors stress careful patient selection. Ask about pancreatitis prevention and the follow-up plan before treatment.

Who may be eligible

  • Small nonfunctional tumors: biopsy-confirmed, no metastasis; under 3 cm in the US study and grade 1 tumors of 15 mm or less in Japan.
  • Insulinoma: with low blood sugar symptoms and a tumor well seen on endoscopic ultrasound.
  • Patients for whom surgery is a burden: older age, other illnesses, or a wish to avoid surgery.
  • Usually not suitable: metastatic or higher-grade tumors, or tumors pressed against the pancreatic duct or large vessels.

Jad AbiMansour, MD, of Mayo Clinic noted that many centers observe tumors until they reach 2 cm and that research on patient selection should continue. Decisions are best made by a multidisciplinary team. Related reading: pancreatic cancer NanoKnife (IRE) and the PELICAN trial of RFA for pancreatic cancer.

Availability in Japan and abroad

RegionStatusBasis
United StatesPerformed at NYU Langone and other university hospitals; seven-center analysis published2026 study
JapanPerformed at Okayama University Hospital under a registered study; meta-analysis publishedjRCTs062230014; 2026 meta-analysis
EuropeGrowing reports from Italy, France and others2026 review

Foreign patients are usually not covered by national insurance, so confirm costs and schedules with each hospital.

For an overseas consultation, prepare recent contrast CT or MRI, the endoscopic ultrasound biopsy report (with Ki-67 and grade), and somatostatin receptor PET if done. For insulinoma, bring blood sugar records and blood tests.

Questions to ask your doctor

  • For my tumor size and grade, is surveillance, surgery or RFA the best fit?
  • How far is the tumor from the pancreatic duct and blood vessels?
  • How are the electrode length and number of applications chosen?
  • What steps reduce the risk of pancreatitis?
  • When are follow-up scans done, and when is a repeat session considered?

See also five questions before an RFA consultation.

Frequently asked questions

Is a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor the same as pancreatic cancer?

No. Common pancreatic cancer is an adenocarcinoma of the duct cells, while neuroendocrine tumors arise from hormone-producing cells. Most grow slowly and are treated differently.

Is one RFA session enough?

In the NYU study about one-third reached complete response after the first session; with repeat sessions where needed, 60% had complete response and 91.1% responded at final follow-up.

How long is the hospital stay?

The median stay at Okayama was 5 days. It varies by hospital and country and may be longer if pancreatitis occurs.

Can insulinoma be treated this way?

In the Japanese meta-analysis, clinical success of RFA for insulinoma was 95%, judged by relief of low blood sugar. Suitability depends on tumor location and size.

This article summarises overseas official sources and studies as general information and is not medical advice. Discuss treatment choices with a doctor who has examined you.

Sources (checked October 30, 2026)